View more presentations from Jeff Belden MD.
NIST will be posting the slides and audio later. You might try here.
Family physician & usability evangelist Jeff Belden MD
writes about EHR usability & data visualization at the point of care.
View more presentations from Jeff Belden MD.
NIST will be posting the slides and audio later. You might try here.
I recently learned about Tall Man lettering.
Not to be confused with Mad Men
I had been annoyed by the ugliness (the typography snob inside) of drug names like acetAZOLAMIDE instead of acetazolamide. Now I know why the words benefit from being homely.
http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/MedErrors/nameDiff.htm | Tall Man Lettering of Drugs
What if the doctor and patient took care of all the necessary work at a visit for managing chronic disease?
Disclosure: I hate getting calls and faxes for refill requests. It seems totally avoidable. I’m not winning this battle.
It’s fairly common for primary care physician offices to get dozens of phone calls or faxes a week about medication refills.
If there is a discrepancy between the pharmacy (or patient) request and my records, it gets a lot worse.
Then calls go back and forth, trying to reconcile the difference, and the outcome is not always satisfactory.
So, what can we do about it?
How about adding a little alert to the medication list?
With this information right in my face, it would be easy to see if, and which, medications need to be refilled today. That avoids an extra call for the patient, an extra fax/call or two for my staff, and a headache for me.
That makes me happy!
(special thanks for the idea to Phil Vinyard at University Physicians Family Medicine Clinics)
EMRs are complex applications.
No Joke.
Here's an example of a fairly typical User Preference Setting dialogs (with my annotations):
It's not always easy to find my way to the preference settings. They might be buried deep in a menu as "Options" or "Settings" or "Preferences". When I look at the options to check, it might be quite hard to understand what will happen if I check or uncheck an option.
Trainers and support staff have nightmares as a result of the complexity.
Offer users more flexibility and the troubleshooting is more complicated, but if users' initial settings are not "just right", then the application won't behave as expected.
How can we empower the physician or nurse user?
How can the preference settings be made more understandable and accessible?
How can we help users have an experience that is "right for them"?
One way would be to place the preference settings closer to where they have an effect (see mock-up image below).
I like to call this "just-in-time personalization".
The little "gears" icon shows up whenever there a few user preference (or "personalization") settings.
I've just started reading Tim Brown's book, "Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation". It quickly had me thinking about innovations in EMR usability.
Design Thinking balances three values:
Desirability, Viability, and Feasibility.
[Tim Brown's illustration]
He describes desirability as meeting true human needs and desires, as opposed to the drummed up desires personified in perfume ads. On a global scale, these needs include clean water, adequate diet, good health, education for children, and a safe community.
What does "desirability" mean for EMR users?
Here are a few of my ideas. What ideas can you add?
Basic Needs & Desires for Physician and Nurse EMR Users
Rapid, easy, intuitive documentation
Smart displays of key information for the task at hand
Foster collaborative decision-making with patients and their families
Enable user-level configurability
How will these changes happen?
Since 2007, hundreds of volunteers have joined the TIGER Initiative to continue the action steps defined at the Summit. The TIGER Initiative is focused on using informatics tools, principles, theories and practices to enable nurses to make healthcare safer, more effective, efficient, patient-centered, timely and equitable. This goal can only be achieved if such technologies are integrated transparently into nursing practice and education. In order to meet the demands of an increasingly electronic and rapidly changing healthcare environment, it is essential to address the educational needs of the nursing workforce.
I'm in a nice local coffee shop, trying to build a presentation about EMR Usability. Christmas music is playing in the background, some of it actually unique.
I think of myself as an evangelist for EMR usability.
How can I deliver a S.T.A.R. Moment for the audience? What is a S.T.A.R. Moment? It stands for "Something They'll Always Remember".
A couple of examples from Nancy Duarte's blog.
What I want for Christmas is an inspiration.
Maybe it will be some dramatic illustration of how often doctors get interrupted, or how much time it takes to do some paltry task, or how long it takes to tell a story in a progress note. Or bringing along an old Underwood typewriter. Or a tableful of clocks or timers.
What's the message?
Usability matters. Here's what it looks like. Give me some.
If I can't get a list with predictive search (where the search field starts guessing what I want from the few characters I've typed so far), then at least give me a heads-up list on one page. Make the list short and comprehensive enough.
I want to find about 80% of my commonly used diagnoses on one page, then multi-select all the diagnoses that I need, and then click "OK". If I can do that, I will be very happy. I've seen it done in at least one EMR.
See, I'm not hard to please.
How would you build the list?
What are the user-centered-design principles?
The single page has some advantages over the predictive search, which can only do one diagnosis at a time.
Go ahead. Make my day.